Just finished reading the first 2 chapters of Wysocki and Lynch's piece: Compose, Design, Advocate, and I really liked what they doing. These first two chapters are really oriented on how to use effective rhetoric and help strengthen your argument.
In the first chapter they talk a man named "Walter" and his conversation shortfall. They then use this to show their 7 problems with their argument.
1. Specific Purpose
2. Audience
3. Large Context
4. Communication Strategy
5. Medium of Communication
6. Order of Information
7. Testing their Communication
This is an awesome breakdown of an argument.
By looking at Context, Audience and Purpose (does a great job explaining each one) then breaks down some good strategy techniques. Like for instance, thinking about where and when this argument is going to take place. What is your audience? What are they going to expect going into it and how can you have an effective purpose statement that can right away, lead your argument in the direction that you want.
Overall the first 2 chapters are super informative. Quick read, super full of helpful information. Would buy if I had money.
-Comrade Chris
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Great Example of Fair Use.
So I had a great discussion today about fair use. I think this youtube clip by Pogo is an excellent example of using less than 3 minutes of a film, qualifying for fair use.
As for how cover bands work, I read this quick blerb about it on wiki:
"Since the Copyright Act of 1909, in the United States there has been a right to record a version of someone else's tune, whether of music alone or of music and lyrics.[7] A license can be specifically negotiated between representatives of the interpreting artist and the copyright holder, or recording of published tunes can fall under a mechanical license whereby the recording artist pays a standard royalty to the original author/copyright holder through an organization such as the Harry Fox Agency, and is safe under copyright law even if they do not have any permission from the original author."
I think thats pretty interesting.
Discalimer: I am not claiming the above work(from wikipedia) is mine nor am I claiming it to be factual.
As for how cover bands work, I read this quick blerb about it on wiki:
"Since the Copyright Act of 1909, in the United States there has been a right to record a version of someone else's tune, whether of music alone or of music and lyrics.[7] A license can be specifically negotiated between representatives of the interpreting artist and the copyright holder, or recording of published tunes can fall under a mechanical license whereby the recording artist pays a standard royalty to the original author/copyright holder through an organization such as the Harry Fox Agency, and is safe under copyright law even if they do not have any permission from the original author."
I think thats pretty interesting.
Discalimer: I am not claiming the above work(from wikipedia) is mine nor am I claiming it to be factual.
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
TED talk on Larry Lessig: Law vs. Creativity.
The link for the TED talk can be found here. I found this presentation fantastic. Lessig, through 3 different parts presents a great argument.
In the first section he explains how one man was afraid that technology(voice recorders) would destroy society and essentially take away the need for vocal cords.
The second talks about how before 1945 it was law that your property extended upwards for an infinite amount of space, and how two farmers tried claiming that planes flying over head were trespassing. Eventually the court rules that this is ridiculous it is "Common Sense".
Finally in the third section he ties this all together with the example that current copy write laws are like the man afraid of technology. Companies like YouTube now take down posts/works that may even fall under fair use just because they use copyrighted material.
Lessig uses this argument to build the idea that a new form of copyrighted laws are going to be needed quickly as this younger generation uses more and more technology to rework, re-engineer, and revision previous work. By using the idea that maybe copyright laws should allow non-commercial use of works so that users can create freely. Overall this piece did a wonderful job of building background and completing his argument.
-Comrade Chris
In the first section he explains how one man was afraid that technology(voice recorders) would destroy society and essentially take away the need for vocal cords.
The second talks about how before 1945 it was law that your property extended upwards for an infinite amount of space, and how two farmers tried claiming that planes flying over head were trespassing. Eventually the court rules that this is ridiculous it is "Common Sense".
Finally in the third section he ties this all together with the example that current copy write laws are like the man afraid of technology. Companies like YouTube now take down posts/works that may even fall under fair use just because they use copyrighted material.
Lessig uses this argument to build the idea that a new form of copyrighted laws are going to be needed quickly as this younger generation uses more and more technology to rework, re-engineer, and revision previous work. By using the idea that maybe copyright laws should allow non-commercial use of works so that users can create freely. Overall this piece did a wonderful job of building background and completing his argument.
-Comrade Chris
Monday, May 28, 2012
The Rhetorical Situation by Bitzer
So I just finished a quick read through of Bitzer's piece: The Rhetorical Situation. I found the piece extremely difficult to read. I understand his 4 categories of rhetoric: purpose, audience, content, context. That all makes sense. He uses some examples that I find hard to follow. I'll edit this post later after a good class discussion so I can accurately explain by findings.
One eternity later...
So we had a pretty good discussion about rhetoric in class today. I have to admit I'm still a little fuzzy on the topic but I'll try and post what I think I understand. I think its the effective use in language by use of context, audience and exigence/motivation. Context meaning how relevant, is it appropriate, and how credible is the speaker. Audience, who is the intended recipient, who could potentially be unintended recipients. And finally what is the motivation for writing this work.
After the discussion I have a greater appreciation for Bitzers break down of rhetoric. Still think its a very dense piece. Made me feel like a idiot reading it.
-Comrade Chris
One eternity later...
So we had a pretty good discussion about rhetoric in class today. I have to admit I'm still a little fuzzy on the topic but I'll try and post what I think I understand. I think its the effective use in language by use of context, audience and exigence/motivation. Context meaning how relevant, is it appropriate, and how credible is the speaker. Audience, who is the intended recipient, who could potentially be unintended recipients. And finally what is the motivation for writing this work.
After the discussion I have a greater appreciation for Bitzers break down of rhetoric. Still think its a very dense piece. Made me feel like a idiot reading it.
-Comrade Chris
Saturday, May 26, 2012
A take on Michigan Tech’s computer literacy.
A take on Michigan
Tech’s computer literacy.
There are many conceptions coming into a technological
university, especially one such as Michigan Tech.
I hear from people down state all the time, “Oh you go to school way up there?
You must have a good head on your shoulders,” or something along those lines. Having the word technological in a title
often gives people the impression that all students up here are magically
gifted with super human computer knowledge. I can tell you that after two and a
half years of tech support on Tech’s campus that that is very far from the
truth. Not everyone, as Palfrey and Gasser would put it, is a “Digital Native” (1).
I admit that there are some extremely bright incoming freshmen with computer
knowledge but not every student is so lucky. Before we begin we need a way to define
knowledge with computers. Let’s break down this kind of tech knowledge into
terms of literacy and fluency.
According to Williams “literacy is defined as
a particular capacity and mode of behavior: the ability to understand and
employ printed information in daily activities at home, at work and in the
community – to achieve one’s goals and to develop one’s knowledge and
potential,”(5). With literature,
literacy is more than just being able to read a simple text. Can the student
decode the meaning out of the text, are they able to comprehend it. Applying
this concept to computers we can gather that it’s the ability to understand
digital material and use it their everyday lives effectively. If a student is reading a PDF instruction on
their computer about how to install a program in a step by step format, their
computer literacy will be tested as they attempt to decode the instructions.
For this reason written literacy and computer literacy are very closely
related.
Moving
onto the next part of this computer knowledge, what does it mean to have Information
Technology (IT) fluency? This is a little trickier. It isn’t the basic skills
such as knowing how to read the text on the computer screen, it’s deeper than
that. Blackmon helps explain by breaking down fluency into the following:
material, confidence, competency, and comfort (154). We can apply these concepts to these any
incoming freshman class. I’ve seen it year after year, walk into a new
residence room to help with their connection issue and there is a brand new
laptop just out of the box, and a student staring blankly at the screen.
The
first concept that we can look at is material. From firsthand knowledge, a surprising amount
of incoming students have never owned their own personal computer before coming
to college. The United States 2009 census
indicates 78% of households have an internet connection (BI:208). So it’s
likely that they have a computer in their family living room however it can be
intimidating when it’s your own. This
can lead to a literary deficiency when it comes to computers. Some of these students have the most basic
problems of even checking e-mail, or following simple digital instructions to
connect to a site. This lack of primary knowledge often leads to frustration
and doubt, the two killers when it comes to working with computers. Even from
Tech’s admission site:
“The computer you’re most comfortable with is the one we recommend,” (¶ 1). Just like a young student starting to read, if
they don’t have the confidence to explore, try something know, or troubleshoot
these kids/young adults are held back by their own fear of the unknown leading
them to a lagging start.
It’s
not that these kids aren’t smart cookies or don’t have the cognitive capacity
to learn computers, it’s just that they haven’t had the time to sit down and
learn. This also comes down to specific knowledge. Just as an example an incoming student could
be very adept at mechanical knowledge, however computers are a completely
different beast. They may have great visualization skills about moving arms, joints
or drive shafts. Things don’t move inside a computer (an exception for the hard
drive), this I think is the biggest problem for most people. How do you
conceptualize how to check your e-mail if you’re lacking confidence to get
started? Through other skills a student can show that they have competency, but
not necessarily with IT. Competency and confidence will eventually lead to
comfort. Only after they gain a bit of preliminary knowledge, primary literacy,
do the start to understand and are able to conceptualize how to use their
laptop or desktop, then all the other fluency and literary skills fall into
place and the student feels comfort with trying something brand new.
It is
my hope as an IT professional is that I can help lead these kids and jump start
their literacy and fluency with computers. I want to break this misconception
that all tech students are great with technology. This is a dangerous mindset
can cause frustration in bright students who fear asking for help because it
could lead to condescension from other students. These students have a tough enough
intellectual career ahead of them and they will need confident fluency and
literacy with IT computing to help build a strong base for their future.
-Comrade Chris
Work Cited:
Williams, Kate. "Literacy and computer literacy:
Analyzing the NRC's 'Being Fluent with Information Technolog'yf." Literacy
and Technology. 3.1 (2003): 20. Web. 23 May. 2012.
<http://www.literacyandtechnology.org/volume3/literacy.katewilliams.pdf>.
Blackmon, Samantha. (Cyber)Conspiracy Theories?; African
American Students in the Computerized Writing Enciroment. Cresskill, NJ:
Hampton Press, 2007. 2007. Print.
Michigan Technological
University Admissions. N.d. www.mtu.edu, Houghton. Web. 23 May
2012. <http://www.mtu.edu/admissions/accepted/computers/>.
"United States Census ." (2009): n.pag. Web. 26
May 2012.
<http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/information_communications/telecommunications.html>.
Palfrey, , and Gasser. "Born Digital." . N.p.,
2009. Web. 26 May 2012. <http://www.perinternet.org/Reports/2009/10-Home-Broadband-Adoption_2009/1-Summary-of-findings.aspx
Tuesday, May 22, 2012
What being fluent in technology means.
I just finished reading Kate Williams peice on Literacy and Computer Literacy: Analyzing the NRC’s Being Fluent with Information Technology
I found it very interesting. In it she goes and describes 11 thesis on litereacy and further goes to describe what that means for us as students, parents, culturally, and for members of society.
The Thesis are as follows:
1. Literacy is a technical skill.
2. Literacy is conceptual.
3. Literacy is historical.
4. Literacy is social.
5. Literacy is intertwined with power.
6. There is a literacy divide between school and home.
7. Bridging different literacies is desirable.
8. Literacy theory is in crisis.
9. Literacy problems suggest that democracy is threatened.
10. Literacy theory is cultural hegemony.
11. The digital format integrates literate forms of communications with non-literate forms.
The thesis that I find most interesting are 9 and 10. I feel like this can be related to the Marxists idea of the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. If the lower masses are computer literate and don't have the necessary materials, competency, or fluency to engage a digital world then how can they make informed decision in a democratic state? This is making the less now have much less. Knowledge is power then we are leaving these computer illiterate people behind.
If the upper classes of society can dominate on the digital sphere then that is leading to cultural hegemony. These people go out and become lawyers, engineers, politicians, important people in society because they have the knowledge to get there. Our country is only as strong as our weakest link and as the proletariat is being left behind, its only making it worse, as a state, country, and globally.
-Comrade Chris
I found it very interesting. In it she goes and describes 11 thesis on litereacy and further goes to describe what that means for us as students, parents, culturally, and for members of society.
The Thesis are as follows:
1. Literacy is a technical skill.
2. Literacy is conceptual.
3. Literacy is historical.
4. Literacy is social.
5. Literacy is intertwined with power.
6. There is a literacy divide between school and home.
7. Bridging different literacies is desirable.
8. Literacy theory is in crisis.
9. Literacy problems suggest that democracy is threatened.
10. Literacy theory is cultural hegemony.
11. The digital format integrates literate forms of communications with non-literate forms.
The thesis that I find most interesting are 9 and 10. I feel like this can be related to the Marxists idea of the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. If the lower masses are computer literate and don't have the necessary materials, competency, or fluency to engage a digital world then how can they make informed decision in a democratic state? This is making the less now have much less. Knowledge is power then we are leaving these computer illiterate people behind.
If the upper classes of society can dominate on the digital sphere then that is leading to cultural hegemony. These people go out and become lawyers, engineers, politicians, important people in society because they have the knowledge to get there. Our country is only as strong as our weakest link and as the proletariat is being left behind, its only making it worse, as a state, country, and globally.
-Comrade Chris
Sunday, May 20, 2012
The idea of Digital Natives
I just finished reading the introduction for "Born Digital" by Palfrey and Gasser and I have to admit I really agree with what they were coming from. The younger generation (~30 and below) are extremely proficient at digital interfacing. So good in fact that they are leaving behind parents, teachers, librarians, and other important traditional mentors.
I feel like I have a good grasp on both the analog and digital world. We had a computer in the house for a long time but we never had internet access for a long time. I think it knowing the old ways of media is extremely helpful for those rare situations where its needed, but that's a dying fancy.
I think the most fascinating thing about this explosion of technological adeptness is how weak governments are at controlling young clever kids. When ever one piracy site goes down, 3 spawn up in its place. When ever one kid gets busted for downloading, there are 10 more who discover it that same day. Today I learned that the RIAA is sueing LimeWire for more money than the world currently owns (World GDP: between $52-62 trillion, Asking amount for sue: $75 trillion). I think the government and these recording companies are losing the battle that it has on their hands and if it wants to be effective digitally its going to need to really change up its game.
-Comrade Chris
I feel like I have a good grasp on both the analog and digital world. We had a computer in the house for a long time but we never had internet access for a long time. I think it knowing the old ways of media is extremely helpful for those rare situations where its needed, but that's a dying fancy.
I think the most fascinating thing about this explosion of technological adeptness is how weak governments are at controlling young clever kids. When ever one piracy site goes down, 3 spawn up in its place. When ever one kid gets busted for downloading, there are 10 more who discover it that same day. Today I learned that the RIAA is sueing LimeWire for more money than the world currently owns (World GDP: between $52-62 trillion, Asking amount for sue: $75 trillion). I think the government and these recording companies are losing the battle that it has on their hands and if it wants to be effective digitally its going to need to really change up its game.
-Comrade Chris
Friday, May 18, 2012
Already Read It.
What if your daily entertainment
site was more than just for laughs? What if while you browsed funny pictures and
movies you learned something new about the world? The website, Reddit is a great example of how a site can
union science with politics, entertainment with humor, and even animals with
death metal.
Reddit is a fast moving information
site where posts are submitted and subject to a voting system. There are many news
sites out in the world but, Reddit stands out from the crowed. The site’s motto
is “The front page of the internet” and
for good reason. Anyone can post
anything about any topic, whether it’s a video, image, site link, question,
comment, or an idea. For example, let’s say a person is really interested in
sea horses. A user can go on the site and view (or create if there isn’t one) a
subreddit. Subreddits are groups that help organize all posts on a specific
topic into one place and help bring people who really like sea horses together to
share, learn, and collaborate. When a
post is submitted to a subreddit it is subject to a voting system. If there is
a sea horse post that appears to be about dogs, the irrelevance of the post is
voted on by other users that can give it a “downvote”. If your post gets too
many “downvotes” it gets “buried,” it doesn’t really go anywhere, however, if
your post is popular and many people like it they can give it an “upvote.” The
more “upvotes” a post gets the more
people tend to notice it. If the votes reach up into the hundreds the post has
the chance to reach the front page! The front page is much like that of a
newspaper; it’s a collection of recent popular posts from all the Subreddits
and put on Reddit’s homepage. The front
page is filtered by popular vote so that the posts with the highest approval
rates are featured, this unique way of channeling certain pieces of media and
information to the front page makes Reddit a different type of news site. This is
a perfect example of Mcluhan’s sense of a global village, everyone is connected
(Mcluhan)1.
Reddit is set up like a news feed.
Posts are organized chronologically with their “upvote” counter shown on the
right. It’s very easily considered a
digital media artifact as it is only found online. Created by Steve Huffman and
Alexis Ohanian, graduates from the University of Virginia in 2005, started the
website as a way to connect people2. The demographic of the site
reaches nearly every age range and nearly every age group, although, that the
average user (~72%) are between 25 to 34 years old and in the lowest income
bracket, $25k and less. (What is the
significance behind this type of age group? Are those between the ages of 25
and 34 more likely to use online websites like this? Is it a generational
thing? Elaborate a little bit.) But with 2.065 billion page views3 what
makes Reddit so popular?
With more than 100,000 subreddits4,
the content on Reddit is astronomical. Entertainment subreddits like /funny have
nearly 1.8 million subscribers, /pics has 1.4 million. What about the more
serious subreddits? What about the non-funny ones? For example /politics has 1.56 million people who follow it. The subreddit based in “Interesting
Facts”, “Today I Learned”, or /TIL, has 1.4 million followers5. This vast contrast of humor and
science brings in a very interesting dynamic to a site. The broad range of topics
established in the site has brought many people from different ages,
ethnicities, and income to one place to browse for new information and
entertainment. Reddit has become a place where people can share their interests
and discover new interests in one single site. The site has few limitations
which allow people to post what they want and “upvote” what they like. Reddit
is open and subject to the people want. With the content and the number of
readers it can vary easily be considered a Hypermedia according to Manovich’s piece
on The Language of New Media6.
Reddit offers laughs and knowledge in one place. Shows like the Magic School Bus, which also try to inform in an
entertaining way, cannot compare to the essence of Reddit. This is where Reddit
rises way above other sites such as Tumblr.com or 9gag.com whose basis is solely on images and
short blogs, Reddit offers more ways to connect and experience new information in
a fun manner that allows the people to choose what is displayed.
When it comes to facts, credibility
is key. Therefore, Reddit users can prove to the admins of the site that they
have certain academic credentials (e.g engineering or geology). After proof is
submitted, their username is tagged with a little icon displaying their field of
study. So when these professionals comment on posts in their field it can help
build a good sense of credibility in what they are saying. This helps to cut
down on false content creating a good strong learning environment. A good Subreddit
example of this is /askscience, where anything from mathematics to
soc./poli-sci./econ./arch./anthro/etc can be found.
Overall Reddit is a very unique site
that offers a lot in way of content and community. I would recommend it to anyone
looking for a few good laughs and might want to learn something interesting
along the way.
Sources
11 -- McLuhan,
Marshall, and Quentin Fiore. The Medium is the Massage. 1st ed. Corte
Madera, CA: Gingko Press, 2001. Print.
22 -- http://thenextweb.com/socialmedia/2011/10/14/a-rundown-of-reddits-history-and-community-infographic/
55 -- www.reddit.com
66 -- Manovich,
Lev, and . The language of New Media. Cambrage, Mass.: MIT Press, 2002.
19-63.
Monday, May 14, 2012
The voice of yesterday(today).
Alright, I just read Marchall McLuhan's The Medium is the Message. I must admit its a very interesting piece. It really brings into account how the internet has really brought us together and is slowly but surly fazing out individualism and ignorance. Even the most minor offenses are seen all over on the web despite who said it about who.
What is the most infectious thing? A bacteria? A virus? A parasite? No, its an idea. An idea can destroy an empire, raise a person to power, unite a faction, collapse a mentality. An idea is very powerful. The internet lets the most frail idea, the tiniest infinitesimal comment or question and it multiplies. From user to user, site to site, blog to blog. Before you know it this idea is in the minds of thousands...no, millions...no...billions of people all around the world. What a world we live in.
What kind of world do we live in? How can we adjust to this super speed of ideas and information? The world at this moment is way to slow. The older generation can't keep up with the younger generation and its creating a rift. This rift is creating an uneasy feeling. Will this rift move up with age? Or will older generations be destined to be left behind by faster and faster technology that the younger are adept at?
I like to think I am skilled with technology, does that mean we have the mentality to deal with change? I like to think so. We are proficient at change. We can adapt to the latest site, game, app, phone, computer, tablet, with the greatest of ease.
I hope I feel like this when I'm 50.
-Comrade Chris
What is the most infectious thing? A bacteria? A virus? A parasite? No, its an idea. An idea can destroy an empire, raise a person to power, unite a faction, collapse a mentality. An idea is very powerful. The internet lets the most frail idea, the tiniest infinitesimal comment or question and it multiplies. From user to user, site to site, blog to blog. Before you know it this idea is in the minds of thousands...no, millions...no...billions of people all around the world. What a world we live in.
What kind of world do we live in? How can we adjust to this super speed of ideas and information? The world at this moment is way to slow. The older generation can't keep up with the younger generation and its creating a rift. This rift is creating an uneasy feeling. Will this rift move up with age? Or will older generations be destined to be left behind by faster and faster technology that the younger are adept at?
I like to think I am skilled with technology, does that mean we have the mentality to deal with change? I like to think so. We are proficient at change. We can adapt to the latest site, game, app, phone, computer, tablet, with the greatest of ease.
I hope I feel like this when I'm 50.
-Comrade Chris
Sunday, May 13, 2012
Simulation vs. Reallity. Look at a Baudrillard Peice.
Before we get started you can find the Baudrillards work here. The work is called Simularcra and Simulations.
I have to admit, this article was a little over my head. But the parts that I did gather I have some huge disagreements with. The first bit that I want to pick apart is the word simulacra. Simulacra is a word that he invented to mean image or representation. Why not just use those words? There are many examples where I feel he just throws out big words for the sake of using big words. They don't add anything to the conversation or meaning, just forces the reader to stop and look up the definition.
But I'm just nitpicking. In the section where he discusses Hyperreal vs. Real, he makes a ridiculous comparison of a concentration camp to Disneyland. He grounds this parallel in the fact that concentration camps have many gadgets inside and little outside. Disney land has this wonderful world full of gadgets inside, and only your automobile outside to go too. This is such a weak association it cant even be warranted to be part of the topic.
Along with Disneyland he goes onto say that its a represented as "Imaginary" and we are to believe the rest is real(rest being Los Angeles, America, The world). When in fact America isn't real but a exaggerated comparison, or simulation. I would fight this by saying no, America, or any other country is real. These things have to be real in a grounded state. If we have no definition or basis of what is real then how can we even begin to tell what is fake? Or what is an image? America is real because it is grounded. There is no imagination in the real. It is what it is.
I'll leave this work unfinished and post more about this later. I'm to pissed at reading this whole thing to reiterate myself typing.
Alright I'm back to finish what I started. After talking about this topic in class. I am still unsatisfied with his work and don't necessarily agree. What is the difference between a simulation and reality? I can clearly see the separation between Mario and myself while playing a game, yet when I die I still say, "Oh, I died." How ever a simulation in real life? like a "fake" bank robbery for example. It IS real to those who don't know that its only a simulation.
So that really puts into question. What is real? How do you define real? (Said first by Morpheus in the Matrix). Does it even matter? If you don't know any better or don't have the ability to know whats real and whats simulation, doesn't it all become real? I think you are forced to see it as real.
-Comrade Chris
I have to admit, this article was a little over my head. But the parts that I did gather I have some huge disagreements with. The first bit that I want to pick apart is the word simulacra. Simulacra is a word that he invented to mean image or representation. Why not just use those words? There are many examples where I feel he just throws out big words for the sake of using big words. They don't add anything to the conversation or meaning, just forces the reader to stop and look up the definition.
But I'm just nitpicking. In the section where he discusses Hyperreal vs. Real, he makes a ridiculous comparison of a concentration camp to Disneyland. He grounds this parallel in the fact that concentration camps have many gadgets inside and little outside. Disney land has this wonderful world full of gadgets inside, and only your automobile outside to go too. This is such a weak association it cant even be warranted to be part of the topic.
Along with Disneyland he goes onto say that its a represented as "Imaginary" and we are to believe the rest is real(rest being Los Angeles, America, The world). When in fact America isn't real but a exaggerated comparison, or simulation. I would fight this by saying no, America, or any other country is real. These things have to be real in a grounded state. If we have no definition or basis of what is real then how can we even begin to tell what is fake? Or what is an image? America is real because it is grounded. There is no imagination in the real. It is what it is.
I'll leave this work unfinished and post more about this later. I'm to pissed at reading this whole thing to reiterate myself typing.
Alright I'm back to finish what I started. After talking about this topic in class. I am still unsatisfied with his work and don't necessarily agree. What is the difference between a simulation and reality? I can clearly see the separation between Mario and myself while playing a game, yet when I die I still say, "Oh, I died." How ever a simulation in real life? like a "fake" bank robbery for example. It IS real to those who don't know that its only a simulation.
So that really puts into question. What is real? How do you define real? (Said first by Morpheus in the Matrix). Does it even matter? If you don't know any better or don't have the ability to know whats real and whats simulation, doesn't it all become real? I think you are forced to see it as real.
-Comrade Chris
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Good moooorrrrrrning Vietnam!
Hey there,
Just wanted to post an opening intro to get the ball rolling on my first blog. I think that it's good to post something on here and speak your mind, for really anyone that will really listen to what you have to say. How many people is that? If you are standing in a room and everyone is talking why should they listen to you? I suppose the answer comes to whomever is interesting enough. I hope that I can be interesting and passionate about my topics/feelings/life that I can draw some sort of crowed in!
-Comrade Chris
Just wanted to post an opening intro to get the ball rolling on my first blog. I think that it's good to post something on here and speak your mind, for really anyone that will really listen to what you have to say. How many people is that? If you are standing in a room and everyone is talking why should they listen to you? I suppose the answer comes to whomever is interesting enough. I hope that I can be interesting and passionate about my topics/feelings/life that I can draw some sort of crowed in!
-Comrade Chris
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)